![]() |
Sexagesimal.org | |||||
Friday, Récole 29, 13 de
en
es
fr
it
nl
pt |
||||||
Frequently asked questions Is this design for a sexagesimal calendar serious? This design is of the utmost seriousness.
It is far more serious than the present calendar.
Is it taking a serious attitude to use two different systems to measure the time, the first one for the day, the second one for the year?
Is it taking a serious attitude to use units (the months) that perpetually change size to measure the time of the year?
Would it occur to us to measure lengths or capacities with variable units? Why challenge the Gregorian calendar? For several reasons. The proposed adoption changes the idea of a "week" to a "sweek" (= six-day-week). Does this not strike a blow at some traditions? Such a reasoning would amount to confusing the walls of an house with its furniture. And what about holidays? Besides the holidays this calendar proposes, it is up to each country to institute its own holidays, religious or civil, according to its own traditions. How will the legalities play out if this calendar is adopted? It is not possible to study here the case of each country. Each country has its own rules and decision processes. Adopting the sexagesimal calendar calls for an adaptation of the local employment law. As its design is more straightforward (one only standard year with regular subdivisions), this adaptation will bring a simplification, and thus a clarification of the rules. The sexagesimal year begins on the day of the boreal winter solstice. Now this day may be a December 21st or 22nd. How to solve this problem? The sexagesimal year does not begin on December 21st or December 22nd.
It begins on... Frigée 1st. As postulated this date coincides
with the boreal winter solstice expressed in universal time. Now
the tropical year lasts 365.2422 days. The result is a quarter
of a day surplus per annum. This surplus is absorbed every four
years by adding a sixth adventitious day at the end of the year.
To be precise, this period will happen to be of five years (less
than once a century). In the sexagesimal calendar the years are notated with three digits. What will happen after the year 999? The year after the year 999 will be the year 1000. And then 1001, 1002,
1003 and so on endlessly. Does this plan have any chance of succeeding? To date all plans for a calendar reform have failed. This one has a real chance of succeeding precisely because it is leaning on the sexagesimal base which the whole humanity already uses to count minutes and seconds. This is why it is universal. |
||||||
![]() |
Edouard Vitrant | ![]() © 2003-2025, Edouard Vitrant |
||||